With the recent banning of Alex Jones by YouTube, it’s time to look back at the cozy relationship Google has had with both Obama and Hillary Clinton.

With the banning of Alex Jones as well as his content from YouTube being removed, it forces one to look back into the cozy relationship Google and their executives have had with both Obama, Clinton, the DNC, and possibly other deep state entities.

Back in 2012, then CEO of Google Eric Schmidt teamed up with Obama. He started several technology start-ups, all of them with the intention of assisting the Obama campaign with data mining and leveraging Google’s expertise. One of those companies called The Groundwork would later become the main technology vendor to the Hillary Clinton campaign. The company used data mining and other Google technologies to target specific voters.

During that time, Eric Schmidt and other Google top executives and engineers visited the Obama white house 430 times. That would account for nearly weekly meetings between Google and Obama.

But, as leaked emails published by Wikileaks show, Schmidt was much more involved with the Clinton campaign than simply offering technology services.

In one leaked email exchange from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, Podesta writes the following about Schmidt:

“He’s ready to fund, advise recruit talent, etc. He was more deferential on structure than I expected. Wasn’t pushing to run through one of his existing firms. Clearly wants to be head outside advisor, but didn’t seem like he wanted to push others out. Clearly wants to get going. He’s still in DC tomorrow and would like to meet with you if you are in DC in the afternoon. I think it’s worth doing.”

From this it looks like Eric Schmidt was willing to offer whatever services the Clinton campaign asked for. This is much more than a CEO simply donating money to the campaign of their preferred candidate. Instead, this is showing 100% allegiance to one candidate and offering the services of the company he runs to assist the campaign. And then funneling it through new companies to keep everything as opaque as possible.

After Podesta and Schmidt met, Schmidt got to work on his vision for exploiting Google’s technology to assist Hillary Clinton to become President. It included obtaining and organizing all available information on voters. His master plan was to take various data sets including voting records, social media profiles, and cable box records.

Below is an excerpt from Schmidt’s master plan:

“Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all that is known about them,” he wrote. “In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify, meet, and update profiles on the voter…quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with the actual voter file with high confidence.”

But it wasn’t just Schmidt doing the heavy lifting. He recruited his top engineers from Google to start working immediately with the Clinton campaign.

As you can see, all of this starts painting a pretty clear picture. Google, which controls a significant portion of not only internet searches, it also controls the largest smart phone operating system Android, as well as the largest online video streaming service in YouTube. So you have a company with near total control of information in the modern age, and they are assisting and using their resources for political purposes.

Fast forward now to the later parts of the 2016 Presidential election and we see Schmidt had decided to get even more involved in politics along with his company Google and their now parent company, Alphabet Inc. No longer content with exploiting Google user data for his own political friends, he now wanted to step into the shady world of political front groups.

In 2017, award winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson published a book titled The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think, and How You Vote. During her research for that book she looked into the origin of the term “fake news” and interesting enough, Eric Schmidt is once again front and center.

According to Attkisson, First Draft was a political action group that was started with the goal of combating “fake news”. Of course, as we all now know, what they meant by “fake news” was any alternative news source that differed from the mainstream narrative that Google and the mainstream media was trying to push. And that’s where Eric Schmidt once again enters the picture. Along with the Soros funded Open Society Foundation, Eric Schmidt was an early and large donor to the political front group First Draft.

Of course, ultimately we know that Donald Trump co-opted the term fake news and ended up turning it against his enemies, including Schmidt. However, when we look at Attkisson’s research, it was originally conceived as a political operation to shut down alternative news sources and narratives. And Eric Schmidt was once again right at the center of this Democratic propaganda operation disguised as a “grass roots” organization. First Draft was not a grass roots organization at all, it was a front group for Schmidt to try to discredit any alternative news sources. But in the end, it backfired.

So now we see the end game of these tech giants and their manipulation. Even with all the tools and power they had at their disposal, even with the entire mainstream media parroting their every talking point, they still lost the election. But unwilling to look at themselves in the mirror and see why they failed, they have instead decided to simply start deleting accounts and sources of information they disagree with. It’s nothing but a clumsy and reckless strategy, and just like before, it will ultimately backfire.

Note: If you enjoyed this article, please make sure to share it. Also, visit our store where we feature different political and meme style T-shirt designs every week. Click here to visit our store.